Tweet about Kopmala.org: Tweet
The Terrifying Truth about Kamala Harris:
Why "1-heartbeat-away" Kamala is More Dangerous than Trump

I've been leftist for 30+ years and not voting for Trump either
but Trump, not Biden/Harris, is the "Lesser Evil" —
Kamala/Joe are the Greater Threat, here's why #NeverBiden

(You may control-F search for (D) since (3)(D) and (E) are perhaps the most shocking)

Intro: If DNC really cares about diversity and our values:

Do we "have to" support Kamala because she's a "Woman of Color?" (In fact, part Indian, part Jamaican, and loves to incarcerate the "black and brown folks" DNC pretends to care about, more on that in a minute) But there was one such woman the public liked, many of us liked a lot, and she ran for President not just VP, and she's also a vet,  she's Congresswoman Tulsi Gabbard (lied about and smeared by media for exposing corruption & wanting to end the #EndlessWars) see 2-minute video in link at item (2) below where Tulsi exposed Kamala's record (Kamala's "response" wasn't a rebuttal of any of the facts) which led to Tulsi shooting up in polls to be in a virtual tie with Kamala at around 5%..Kamala then crashed and burned in polls and dropped out; Tulsi however is anti-empire, anti regime change, not in with us being an Endless Mass Murder Machine aka most powerful and deadly empire in human history so, the MSM smeared and lies about Tulsi and killed her chances. Just like they lied about Jill Stein in 2016  pretending she was "anti vaccine" when Jill 100% supports vaccines and said so clearly but also wants oversight to protect from for-profit corporate influence over the process, and safety, wanted that cleaned up.

Not that the candidate's genitals and skin color should ever be what becomes the main factors or overrides policies(they sell us politicians based on gender and race who end up like HRC and others, be the most ardent to bomb brown people, kill Muslims, drone and devastate and make refugees out of women, men, and children, overseas, and to mass incarcerate poor and POC in the U.S. as done in 1990s, and to smash welfare aid to single moms as HRC eagerly backed Bill Clinton in doing etc..if anything they're even worse, since they can get away with it more than if it were a straight white cis male Republican Christian doing the same things as politician—ceteris paribus, there's much more outcry from MSM as well as Dems in that case) , but Tulsi was the woman of color we could have had for president, not just VP  --and strong chances —many independents and even some anti-war conservatives liked Tulsi—if we had anywhere near a fair and free election not manipulated by the biggest "election interference" machine: which is internal to the U.S. and dwarfing what other countries can even dream of having ever done(and dwarfed by the massive overthrow and massive interference our empire does to other countries;proportionately imagine a country 100 or 1000 times riches than the U.S. spending immense sums to fund opposition groups and plant stories...that's what we do all over the world and have since at least WWII)
Before his embarrassing complete, total U-turn to please DNC
after Kamala was 'selected' by insiders to be VP nominee:

"Okay: Let's get to the ugly revelations about Kamala— let's hear it!"


The must-read item(3) highlights some lesser known (for many, unknown) ugly actions by her as AG (Attorney General); (3) was going to be quick few quotes but as I dug it got even uglier--feel free to skip to or even search-in-email for "(D)" since parts (D) and (E) of (3) quote and links to some of Kamala's lesser known most outrageous and harmful abuses

(1a)I haven't clicked the full CNN but if this isn't Manufacturing Consent and "preparing the public's mind" I don't know how much more explicit you could get:

Joe Biden made the pick that maximized his chances of continuing to make the race a straight referendum on Trump while also selecting someone whose resume suggests being ready to step in, if and when Biden decides to step aside.

It would have been a *screaming* case of preparing the public for it if they said  just "if..he d decides to step aside"
But "if and when"? ...that's so obvious you want to use Biden's "C'mon, man!"

Now let's get lay down some truths:

(1b) Shaun King shilling exposed, just two screenshots

1/14/2018 Shaun King:
I'll be frank and tell you two Democrats that I am 99% sure I won't be supporting - primarily because of their dismal history on criminal justice reform over the course of their entire careers. Joe Biden & Kamala Harris. They both helped build & advance mass incarceration.
[I wondered if it was photoshopped; it's so perfectly wrong — the exact 2 he was most against — but nope, it's real: 
https://twitter.com/shaunking/status/1062714105931460608 ]
[Update: It was up in Aug 2020, deleted now! See preceding link for screenshot]

Aug 11, 2020
That's it for me. I am incredibly proud to see a brilliant Black woman, and HBCU grad, chosen as a Vice Presidential nominee. I've done political work my whole life. It's rarely things dreams are made of. Kamala Harris is the most progressive VP nominee in American history.

Throwing people in jail for pot, laughing about it when asked if she used pot,

Threatening to jail parents if kids are absent from school again

Using slave labor prisoners as long a possible as a few cents an hour workforce

And  people on DEATH ROW -- that's where it's  ugliest --  hiding evidence that they were innocent.

Equals "most progressive VP nominee in American  history"

I avoid reading Shaun's twitter for sake of my sanity..but now I see why he's so hated but sane minded actual leftists.I don't like race-based attacks of any kind including the pun on Malcolm X made against Shaun but  you don't have to stoop to that to call out a despicable apologist for mass incarcerators ready to let innocent people be Murdered by the State by withholding evidence of innocence. I thought only the worst Republicans do that..turns out the DNC's VP pick is the kind of person who does that, and disgusting enablers of such atrocious acts like Shaun have lots of sheep thinking he's "progressive" let alone that Kamala is.
(2) Flashback:
Tulsi Gabbard torches Kamala Harris on Criminal Justice Reform

Also just before and after the 7 minute mark, Jimmy Dore found the account of Lily Adams, who served as Kamala Harris' Director of Communications -- Adams had a tweet referring to war criminal Hillary Clinton the enabler of Iraq catastrophic war, the one who talked Obama into and *spearheaded* the murderous war on Libya leaving massive death, giving ISIS foothold, having live human slave auctions in the failed state aftermath and Libya used as funnel to pipeline arms into hands of boy-beheading terrorists and other "moderates" working hand in glove with, often on their own (see preceding re "beheading") being as bad as -- ISIS and Al Qaeda --

--Kamala's Communication  Director's comment about Neocon Warmonger destroyer-of-Libya-and-Syria Hillary? Oh if only Hillary Clinton had won we'd have had a "foreign policy expert as president. Would have been nice!" (7:00) -- Jimmy Dore shows screenshot of that tweet by top Kamala aide:

(recall the pro-Hillary mainstream media called Libya "Hillary's War" not like us pro-peace critics came up with that term.

She joined Susan Rice and other warmongers to form coalition to pressure and convince Obama who was leaning against the Libya war..they spearheaded that war, principally Hillary, but also per experts, very likely Biden Secretary of State, Susan Rice, did as well --and you'll be told to shut up and  not be "racist" and "misogynist against a 'strong woman'" if you criticize when Regime Changer In Chief like a Susan Rice pushes towards another thousands, or 10,000s more dead people of color (and US vets, 43% of our military is non-white) being killed and maimed. Don't say you had no warning of this if Biden gets in. Trump not only has  murdered at a rate that can't come close to keeping up with the murder-rate of  Obama-HRC, but also the Media, out of irrational/partisan etc often, but at least does put a critical light on him so he knows he can't just get away with mass murder and, you know, get rehabilitated like war criminal George W Bush was, or get a Nobel Peace Prize just before killing a half million in Libya-and-Syria joint regime-change-based-on-lies operations, like Obama)

Finally the ugly specific details, exhibits (A) through (F) dear readers:
Vote for Biden/Harris and that's the monstrosity you're voting for. Trump can't keep up with 1/2 or 1/3 or even 1/4 of the mega death-toll of 500,000+ (even if you count Venezuela assault spearhead by deep state which is always doing that and did so  under Obama and even did the full regime change coup against Honduras--that one again right at the hand of HRC--HRC's own advisors told Hillary the coup was illegal--she still worked to enable the blood-soaked coup-regime to rid the democratically elected 'leftist' president Zelaya)..Trump is letting the machine do ugly things but not nearly at the GWB-level or HRC-spearheads-BO/Biden-enable level


Must-Read Highlights-- especially items (D) and (E) --Kafkaesque, Kangaroo Courts, but all interesting -- endless abuses--the worst kind of "Top Cop" (Attorney General) behaviors:
(As one top black progressive vlogger on youtube, reminded, don't fall for "it was all killers and rapists and terrorists" -- nope, those even suspected of that (let alone those actually guilty of it, even smaller) is a tiny fraction -- most of those abused by the court system and police just have MJ on them, parking ticket they couldn't afford to pay,  late child support they're semi-homeless and couldn't quite pay the whole thing, non-violent crimes etc --that's who's getting abused -- except, as these show: also **innocent** people not even guilty of that, got swept up--who cares if you're innocent? It might make a corrupt politician look "tough" to blow up your life, frame you, withhold evidence of innocence, etc, so tough luck, suck it up:

(A) Parents in jail:

In 2010 her office sponsored a bill to take the program statewide. But in the hands of other district attorneys, the statute was used in at least a handful of cases to put parents behind bars. Critics have said that the policy has been disproportionately wielded against poor parents of color. In an interview, Harris said she regrets any "unintended consequences" of the state law.

Translation: "Having it hurt my political ladder-climbing careers was an 'unintended consequence' "

(B) Death Penalty aka State-Sponsored Execution:

In 2014, when a federal court judge ruled that California's administration of the death penalty was unconstitutional, Harris appealed the decision as state attorney general, arguing that it was "not supported by the law."

Harris later said that she was obligated to defend capital punishment as the legal representative of the state. Many have pointed out that she was happy not to defend a constitutional ban on same-sex marriage that voters passed in Proposition 8 when it was challenged a year earlier. Harris' response: She was merely reflecting the position of her client, Gov. Jerry Brown's administration

(C) Madden Scandal:

In March 2010, just as Harris was campaigning to become California's attorney general, San Francisco authorities shut down a police department crime lab in the city's Hunters Point naval yard. A technician named Deborah Madden was accused of skimming drugs, raising broader questions about the lab's ability to appropriately handle evidence in criminal cases. (Madden later pleaded guilty).

Harris immediately dismissed 20 drug cases, but the number eventually grew to over 1,500 after documents showed that prosecutors within Harris' office had known about Madden's potential unreliability months before the lab was closed, but had neglected to tell defense attorneys.

A superior court judge later excoriated Harris' office, writing that the violations infringed on the defendants' constitutional rights. ..[Harris] has also said that she did not know about the problems at the crime lab until after the scandal blew up [so, is she lying or is she truthfully saying she lacked the competence --or giving a hoot --to have dug enough to know more?]

(D) Another case of "Oh, I just wasn't aware"

that hasn't done much to assuage the concerns of critics who say Harris had a tendency toward prosecutorial overreach, which continued once Harris became the state's attorney general. In 2015, for example, lawyers for an inmate convicted of murder attempted to have the case thrown out after new evidence suggested that Riverside County prosecutors lied on the stand during the initial trial.[aka lying under oath, which is something that unless it's SEVERELY punished when prosecutors do it --regardless of how innocent we think the person is or isn't --unless there's a huge deterrent, you can kiss what little fairness we have in court for ALL of us, goodbye -ED]

Harris' office, representing the state prison system, resisted[justice], only backing down after footage of one of her deputies being eviscerated by three federal judges went viral. A spokesperson for her since-abandoned presidential campaign said Harris ordered her office to drop the challenge as soon as[here we go again] "she became aware" of the case.

(E) Sex, Lies, and Political Ladder Climbing hurting those you pretend to help:

"[trying to score cheap points versus prostitution].. earned Harris some criticism from civil libertarians and from advocates for sex workers..." A fascistic  politicians like Kamala, ready to throw moms and dads in jail because their kids are absent/tardy too many times, of course doesn't stop at trying to score cheap points pretending to help sex workers leading to the workers themselves opposing her (see last link which includes quotes from sex workers including: " "[Kamala's Moral Police actions] basically forced me back into much more dangerous forms of sex work.. I found myself fighting eviction, trying to scrape together enough money to eat every day. I returned to clients that I had refused because they did hard drug. I was, just generally, in much more dangerous situations with people" ; Different person: "With Backpage, you had the opportunity to connect with clientele that were already familiar with what was expected of them in that kind of transactional relationship. They were more professional and safer." ] then of COURSE she'll show her fascist side by arresting heads of media that merely run ads, too:

Harris had the CEO of Backpage.com, Carl Ferrer, arrested on pimping charges. Backpage was an online classifieds site known for its "adult services" section, which prosecutors had long warned served as a market place for sex traffickers [so does the bleeping entire INTERNET, email service providers, etc, fascists. I want a world without sex workers at all —excepting therapist sex  surrogate type work— but out of them no longer being in demand, not from fascist, 1980s 'Moral Majority' type authoritarian leftist careerists or virtue signalers who choose to be wearing a "DNC/progressive" button while doing so]. The arrest was based on a contentious legal argument that pit anti-trafficking fervor against the First Amendment. Since Backpage was merely a platform for ads, its lawyers argued, it was protected by the same law that protects Google from being held liable for illicit websites listed in its search results.

A superior court judge agreed and threw out the case..

And if prosecutors LYING in court isn't a problem until Kamala eventually "finds out" then neither are false confessions:

Critics point to other examples. There was her office's decision to defend [keep pushing] a molestation conviction that local prosecutors had secured with a false confession. [link quote includes: "Ms. Harris and her staff defended the indefensible—California State prosecutor Murray flat out falsified a transcript of a defendant's confession.. With the two sentences that state's attorney Murray perjuriously added, Murray was able to threaten charges that carried a term of life in prison..Capitalizing to the maximum on his outright fabrication, state's attorney Robert Murray committed his own crime against the defendant at the crucial time when defense counsel was consulting with the defendant on a possible plea.Prosecutor Murray had ample time and opportunity to correct his lies and his falsification of the transcript, but instead, he let it go until defense counsel had encouraged his client to plead guilty based on this fabricated evidence" Just like with RussiaGate and other examples where people confess to, often, things they are NOT guilty of, because it's terrifying to face immense sentences. But this one takes the cake.Let's pretend you said things you didn't say, and then your defense attorney and you decide to avoid life in prison you better "confess" to the lesser charge.]

Just as earlier we noted that prosecutors lying on court must face massive penalties or else the REST of us will lose what little fairness (or protection for fairness) there is in courts -- similarly for false confessions being used. Of course they'll claim the person was guilty -- we don't want even the hypothetically guilty -- not even Jack the Ripper taken down the wrong way--the truly guilty must be convicted without abuses-- not via false confession for the same reason I don't want the KKK or ISIS or Al Qaeda to be taken down via torture or false confession or prosecutors lying to the court *etc* violations of standards that protect us *all* -- if someone's guilty, you "take them down" the legitimate way, not via kangaroo court proceedings. It's exactly the logic of "it's okay to torture al qaeda[suspects]" And that's the super ugly activity they engaged in, super ugly even if someone were (let's "Trust them" for a moment) guilty -- let alone (and Kamala and her gang have a record here) of not caring if someone is actually in fact *innocent* -- like that other fellow on death row, you know?

As if that's not enough, this kind of horrific misconduct is bad even in cases when the person *is* guilty because then if prosecutors are later caught, it may lead to the guilty person getting no sentence at all because of the insane misconduct of the prosecutors. So it's lose-lose (bad whether person is  innocent or guilty) but really lose-lose-lose because as noted all of us, the public, is far less safe to have even minimal protections for fairness, in court, if prosecutors can lie or here--outright fabricate.A bit more from the Observer link:

California Judge H.A. Staley got it right. He found that Mr. Murray's fabrication of "evidence"—falsifying the transcript of a confession during discovery and plea negotiations—was "egregious, outrageous, and . . . shocked the conscience."

The trial judge saw no laughing matter—and neither should the rest of us. He dismissed the indictment completely, and in a scathing opinion, also quoted by the appellate court, wrote that the prosecutor's actions "diluted the protections accompanying the right to counsel and ran the risk of fraudulently inducing defendant to enter a plea and forfeit his right to a jury trial." The court refused to "tolerate such outrageous conduct that results in the deprivation of basic fundamental constitutional rights that are designed to provide basic fairness."

Undaunted by the criminal conduct of a state prosecutor, or the district court's opinion, Ms. Harris appealed the decision dismissing the indictment. According to the California attorney general, only abject physical brutality would warrant a finding of prosecutorial misconduct and the dismissal of an indictment. Fortunately for all of us—and the Constitution—she lost again.

This is Ms. Harris' third strike in hardly as many months—and those are only the ones that have come to our attention.


They then go into another case you can click for details but just glancing to get a few blurbs about "justice" under AG Kamala Harris:

There is the outrageous misconduct by the state court agents and investigators in the Sierra Pacific/Moonlight Fire case that caused a state judge to enter a multi-million judgment against Cal Fire. And only a few weeks ago, Ninth Circuit Judges Kozinski, Fletcher and Wardlaw saw misconduct so egregious that Judge Kozinski raised the specter of a perjury prosecution of the prosecutor during the oral argument. Attorney General Harris had to reverse course on that case, but she did so only after the Ninth Circuit judges made clear that she would not like the opinion that would be forthcoming if she did not correct it herself. In that case, Baca, the state court of appeal saw evidence that the prosecutor himself had committed perjury. If Ms. Harris' office had its way, it all would have been swept under the rug. Most Americans thought the laws of perjury and obstruction of justice already applied to prosecutors and are shocked to find out that they rarely suffer any consequence—not even termination—when failing to abide by them. Americans should be shocked.

https://observer.com/2015/03/california-prosecutor-falsifies-transcript-of-confession/

(F) After the above 5+ course meal, here's an after-dinner mint:

Another example: her office's refusal to take over a 2011 Seal Beach mass shooting case after a judge recused the entire Orange County District Attorney's office for widespread prosecutorial misconduct. Harris recently defended her decision: "it was being handled at the local level."

[Highlights are from NorthCoastJournal detailed article, with some quotes from Observer piece it links to and another piece quoting sex workers about how Kamala's actions to 'protect' sex workers were hurting them.

Back to Main Kopmala page


See also:
Which 2020 candidate is more reactionary-right-wing?
Which candidate is the "Lesser Evil"?
We answer from a left-wing perspective but
the documented fact-based answer may shock you;
it "ain't" Biden — see our other website:
LesserEvil2020.com

(Coming soon..)


Tweet about Kopmala.org:
© 2020- by Kopmala.org — please link to us.